How strong are your micromanagement tendencies?
Management styles vary a lot, and for obvious reasons. Managers and their teams are very different, and what may be useless for one might be the best trick ever for the next. One management style that is often the topic of hot debates is micromanagement. People may hate or love it while pretending not to – but everyone has heard of it. The term micromanagement is among the most reviled in a manager’s vocabulary. And rightly so! When we typically talk of a micromanager, we envisage a tough manager with thick glasses who keeps an eye on everything under the roof of the workplace, an office’s big brother. Additionally, we assume some more things about this hypothetical manager, most of which are harmful. It happened because micromanagement has earned a negative reputation over time. But is that the correct conclusion? Let’s find out. The usual definition of micromanagement covers a few things – hyper fixation on details, an abundance of updates, and an extreme level of engagement with employees. Beyond the basics, we also understand that a micromanager’s approach is designed to achieve the highest level of productivity and efficiency possible. A tinge of perfectionism is clearly visible. Overall, the road to micromanagement is paved solely with good intentions.